CourtListener 10137491•State v. Miles
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT
IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2),
SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Michael Dennis Miles,
Appellant.
Appeal From Florence County
James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-208
Submitted January 29, 2004 Filed March
25, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, Office of Appellate Defense,
of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, of Florence, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Appellant pled guilty to homicide
by child abuse and was sentenced to twenty years in prison. Pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Appellants counsel attached a petition
to be relieved. Appellant did not file a pro se response.
After a review of the record as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues
that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and
grant counsels petition to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.