In the Interest of Charles Steven B.

CourtListener 10137485Scctapp30 mars 2004

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest of Charles Steven B.,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Greenwood County

Billy A. Tunstall, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-225

Submitted January 29, 2004 – Filed March
30, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, Office of Appellate
Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Townes Jones, IV, of Greenwood, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Charles pled guilty
to one count of simple assault and battery, one count of disturbing schools,
one count of hindering an officer, and two counts of assault and battery of
a high and aggravated nature.  Subsequently, the family court committed him
to the Department of Juvenile Justice for an indeterminate period of time. 
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Charles’ counsel
attached a petition to be relieved.  Charles did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Charles’ appeal and grant counsel’s petition
to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE,
JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.