CourtListener 10137422•State v. Sanders
Texte intégral
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Clarence D. Sanders,
Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-108
Submitted December 23, 2003 Filed February 18, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda P. Hagler, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans,
Jr., Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, S.C. Dept. of Probation,, of Columbia,
for Respondents.
PER CURIAM: Clarence
D. Sanders was convicted as a habitual traffic offender and sentenced to five-years
imprisonment, suspended upon the service of five-years probation. As a result
of a probation violation and revocation hearing, Sanders probation was revoked
in full, and he was ordered to serve five-years imprisonment. Pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sanders counsel attached a petition
to be relieved as counsel. Sanders filed a pro se response.
After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Fortunes appeal and grant counsels
petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTRIDGE, JJ., concurring.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving
any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.