State v. Ceasar

CourtListener 10137391Scctapp27 févr. 2004

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT
SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2),
SCACR.

THE
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In
The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

David Ceasar,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Sumter County

Thomas W. Cooper, Jr.,
Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-138

Submitted December 23, 2003 – Filed February 27, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, Office
of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Cecil Kelley Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
David Ceasar was convicted of possession of a weapon during the commission
of a violent crime and armed robbery.  He was sentenced to five years imprisonment
for possession of a weapon and life imprisonment without parole for armed robbery. 
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ceasar’s counsel
attached a petition to be relieved.  Ceasar filed a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss Ceasar’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD,
and KITTRIDGE, JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving
any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.