State v. Suber

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Boyce Travon Suber       
Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-036

Submitted November 19, 2003 – Filed January 20, 2004

 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellant Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster; Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Boyce Travon Suber was indicted
of and subsequently convicted of possession of crack cocaine with intent to
distribute.  Suber’s appellate counsel submitted a petition to be relieved as
counsel, stating he has reviewed the record and has concluded Suber’s appeal
is without merit.  Suber did not file a pro se brief with the court.

After a review of the record as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues
that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Suber’s appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

[1]
 
Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal,
we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules 215 and 220(b)(2),
SCACR.