State v. Coe

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Anthony Willard Coe       
Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-053

Submitted November 19, 2003 – Filed
January 22, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellant Defender, Wanda P. Hagler, Office
of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson; 
and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Anthony Willard Coe appeals
from the revocation of his probation. Counsel for Coe attached to the final
brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Coe did not file a separate pro
se brief.

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Coe’s appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court
in resolving the issues on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rules 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.