CourtListener 10137271•State v. James
Texte intégral
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
David James,
Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
Henry F. Floyd, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-763
Submitted October 15, 2003 Filed December
31, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson;
and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: David James appeals his convictions
and sentences for criminal sexual conduct, taking a hostage, and knowingly exposing
another to HIV. Counsel for James attached to the final brief a petition to
be relieved as counsel. James did not file a separate pro se response.
After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.