State v. Roberts

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Roy Allen Roberts,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Dorchester County

Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-563  

Submitted July 15, 2003 – Filed September 29, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia; for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy John
W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson; of Columbia,
Solicitor Walter M. Bailey, of Summerville; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Roy A. Roberts appeals from a circuit
court order accepting guilty pleas for felony DUI involving death, habitual
traffic offender and driving under suspension (third offense).  Roberts contends
the circuit court erred in accepting the guilty plea because it was conditional. 
In his separate pro se brief Roberts argues two issues:  (1) the
adequacy of his counsel’s representation and (2) the sufficiency of evidence
the State needed to prove.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Roberts’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.