State v. Baldwin

CourtListener 10137076Scctapp17 juin 2003

Texte intégral

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Tonnie N. Baldwin #2,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-398

Submitted April 18, 2003 – Filed June 17, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender
Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney Henry Dargan McMaster;  Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all
of Columbia;  and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Tonnie N. Baldwin was indicted for grand
larceny, possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime and
armed robbery.  Following a jury trial, he was convicted on all charges and
sentenced to life without the possibility of parole.  

Counsel for Baldwin attached a petition to be relieved to
the final brief stating she had reviewed the record and found the appeal to
be without merit.  After a review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Baldwin’s appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON and HUFF, JJ., concur.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving
the issues on appeal, we decide this case without
oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.