State v. Armstrong

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Leonard Neal Armstrong,       
Appellant.

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-429

Submitted April 18, 2003 – Filed
June 24, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A.
Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Leonard Neal Armstrong appeals
from an order of the trial court revoking his probation.  The court found a
willful violation of probation and revoked his probation.  Armstrong’s appellate
counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967).  Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved from representation,
asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable merit.  Armstrong
did not file a pro se response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to Anders
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss
the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON, and HUFF, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.