State v. Baldwin

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Tonnie N. Baldwin #1,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

James R. Barber, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-421

Submitted April 18, 2003 – Filed June 24, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender
Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster; Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles
H. Richardson, all of Columbia;  and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken;
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Tonnie N. Baldwin was indicted for first
degree burglary and armed robbery.  Following a jury trial, he was convicted
on both charges and sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment totaling twenty
years.    This appeals follows.

Counsel for Baldwin attached a petition to be relieved to
the final brief stating she had reviewed the record and found the appeal to
be without merit.  Baldwin filed a separate pro se brief.  After
a review of the record and counsel and Baldwin’s briefs pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss
[1] Baldwin’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON and HUFF, JJ., concur.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving
the issues on appeal, we decide this case without
oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.