State v. Reed

CourtListener 10136902Scctapp13 mars 2003

Texte intégral

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Reginald Reed,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-192

Submitted January 29, 2003 – Filed March
13, 2003   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia; for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Reginald Reed appeals his guilty
plea to fifteen counts of forgery, arguing the trial judge violated the mandate
of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1965), by accepting a plea that was
not knowingly and voluntarily entered.  After a thorough review of the record
and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Reed’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY and SHULER, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.