CourtListener 10136895•State v. Busby
Texte intégral
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Tommy D. Busby,
Appellant.
Appeal From Anderson County
J. C. Buddy Nicholson, Jr., Circuit
Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-200
Submitted January 29, 2003 Filed March 17, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender
Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John
W. McIntosh and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Druanne Dykes White, of Anderson; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Tommy Busby appeals his guilty
plea to assault with intent to commit CSC and assault with intent to kill.
Busby argues the trial court violated the mandate of Boykin v. Alabama,
395 U.S. 238 (1965), by accepting his guilty plea because his plea was not knowingly
and voluntarily entered. After a thorough review of the record and counsels
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Busbys appeal and grant counsels
motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY and SHULER,
JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.