State v. Clark

CourtListener 10136844Scctapp19 févr. 2003

Texte intégral

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Joseph Harlan Clark,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-134

Submitted January 10, 2003 – Filed February
19, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of
Columbia; for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles
H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Druanne Dykes White, of Anderson;
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Joseph Harlan Clark appeals
his guilty plea conviction for indecent exposure.  Appellate counsel has filed
a final brief accompanied by a petition to be relieved and Clark has not filed
a pro se response brief.

After a thorough review of the record on appeal
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we grant counsel’s petition
and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY, and SHULER, JJ., concur.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.