Syrios v. Lane County Assessor

TC-MD 180237NOrtc

Texte intégral

FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 180237N 1
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT
MAGISTRATE DIVISION
Property Tax
WILLIAM L. SYRIOS, for the Syrios Trust, )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff, TC-MD 180237N
v.
LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR,
FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL1	Defendant.
This matter came before the court on its own motion to dismiss following Plaintiff’s
failure to appear at two telephone proceedings.
Plaintiff first failed to appear for a telephone hearing set for June 27, 2018. Plaintiff
explained that he failed to appear at that hearing because the email notice went to his “junk mail”
and requested that the court send hearing notices by mail. (Ptf’s Ltr at 1, Jul 12, 2018.) The
court set a second hearing for July 30, 2018, and sent Plaintiff notice by mail. Plaintiff failed to
appear for the second hearing. The court sent an Order to Show Cause on August 1, 2018,
allowing Plaintiff 14 days to explain why his case should not be dismissed pursuant to Tax Court
Rule-Magistrate Division 21, which allows the court to enforce its directives with sanctions
including dismissal.
On August 20, 2018, the court received Plaintiff’s letter explaining that the second
hearing “slipped by” while he was working on an IRS tax audit. (Ptf’s Ltr at 1, Aug 20, 2018.)
Plaintiff explained that the audit was “near overwhelming and paperwork intensive,” although he
stated it was “not an excuse” and apologized for missing the hearing. (See id.)
1 This Final Decision of Dismissal incorporates without change the court’s Decision of Dismissal, entered
September 6, 2018. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its
Decision of Dismissal was entered. See Tax Court Rule–Magistrate Division (TCR–MD) 16 C(1).
FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 180237N 2
The court appreciates Plaintiff’s candor and sincerity in explaining his failure to appear
for the hearing on July 30, 2018. Unfortunately, Plaintiff’s explanation did not identify any
extenuating circumstances or other adequate cause for the failure to appear. See, e.g., Jarmin v.
Dept. of Rev., TC-MD 180089G, 2018 WL 3302753 (Jul 5, 2018) (dismissing appeal where
taxpayers’ representative missed a second hearing due, in part, to his “heavy post-tax-season
workload”). The court dismisses this case without prejudice, meaning that Plaintiff is free to file
a new appeal within the time permitted by statute. Now, therefore,
IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed.
Dated this day of September 2018.
ALLISON R. BOOMER
MAGISTRATE
If you want to appeal this Final Decision of Dismissal, file a complaint in the
Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,
Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street,
Salem, OR.
Your complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final
Decision of Dismissal or this Final Decision of Dismissal cannot be changed.
TCR-MD 19 B.
This document was signed by Magistrate Allison R. Boomer and entered on
September 25, 2018.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.