362 Or 38 ; 362 Or 39•Petitions for review, September 25 and October 5, 2017
Texte intégral
38 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (403 P3d 776-777, 779-783, 786) ALLOWED October 5, 2017 Goodman v. SAIF Corporation (A155105)(S063689)(274 Or App 316, rev den, 358 Or 529). Respondent’s petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 391 P3d 773 (2017). Kramer v. City of Lake Oswego (A156284)(S065014)(285 Or App 181) Robles v. SAIF Corporation (A153691)(S062729)(266 Or App 228). Respondents’ petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 391 P3d 773 (2017). SAIF Corporation v. Carlos-Macias, (A150950)(S062422)(262 Or App 629). Petitioners’ petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 391 P3d 773 (2017). Sather v. SAIF Corporation (A149547)(S063470)(272 Or App 263). Respondents’ petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 391 P3d 773 (2017). Schaffer v. SAIF Corporation (A153630)(S062738)(266 Or App 227). Respondents’ petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 391 P3d 773 (2017). Sieczkowski v. Lane County (A152399)(S062526)(264 Or App 246). Respondent’s petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 391 P3d 773 (2017). State v. Kimbrough, Dustin (A157030)(S064985)(285 Or App 84) State v. Miller, Jacob Matthew (A150972)(S065112)(284 Or App 818), rev dismissed, 362 Or 300 DENIED October 5, 2017 Allen, Earl, III v. Premo (A159827)(S065164)(285 Or App 652) Chavez, Ronald Lee v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A162148) (S065174)(286 Or App 838) Clark, Michael Ray v. Nooth (A155558)(S064964)(284 Or App 762) Department of Human Services v. A. M. (A163887-89)(S065190)(286 Or App 304) Derrick, Robert L. v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A162534) (S065126)(286 Or App 304) Hernandez-Alvarado, Ivan Javier v. State of Oregon (A159229)(S065185)(285 Or App 652) Jenkins, Michael W. v. Myrick (A162171)(S065206)(285 Or App 888) Kelley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (A156153)(S064010) (276 Or App 553) Laird, Amos v. Nooth (A161025)(S065115)(285 Or App 888) Lunsford, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lunsford, Rodney Gale, Deceased v. NCH Corporation / Dynacco, Inc. v. Rudd Company, Inc. (A154902) (S064949)(271 Or App 564 (2015), vac’d and rem’d, 360 Or 235 (2016), aff’d, 285 Or App 122). Landau, J., would allow.
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued 39 (403 P3d 774, 777-780, 783-786) Matveyev v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (A160217) (S064514)(282 Or App 72) Odoms, Donald C. v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A160807) (S065035)(285 Or App 652)(petition and supplemental petition) Oslund, Jann Raymond v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A162724) (S065059)(286 Or App 305) Schwartz and Battini (A160757)(S065130)(286 Or App 527) Siefken, Gregory v. Premo (A154453)(S065087)(284 Or App 692)(petition and supplemental petition) State v. Ambriz-Arguello, Mauricio (A156699)(S065154)(285 Or App 583). Balmer, C. J., would allow. State v. Armas, Richard Bryan (A158806)(S065006)(284 Or App 557) State v. Bonilla-Vergara, Cruz (A160342)(S065179)(286 Or App 676) State v. Bristow, Kevin Earl (A159440)(S065111)(284 Or App 890) State v. Farris, Robin Jay (A159105)(S065021)(284 Or App 557) State v. Geddes, Kyle Douglas (A159593)(S065192)(285 Or App 888). Landau and Nakamoto, JJ., would allow.* State v. Gerety, Erin A. (A157516)(S065141)(286 Or App 175) State v. Golden, Artis Lee, Jr. (A159363)(S065215)(285 Or App 888) State v. Hevener, Thomas James (A161081)(S065028)(285 Or App 344) State v. Mayo, Dajuan Marcelleus (A160899)(S065173)(286 Or App 838) State v. Moore, Kenneth Everett (A158947)(S065211)(286 Or App 304) State v. Salas, Michael George, Jr. (A161172/73)(S065226)(286 Or App 838) State v. Smith, Bobbi Jo (A161034)(S065186)(285 Or App 889) State v. Williams, Jon Allen (A160906)(S065122)(285 Or App 652) Zuzel, John Gabriel v. Myrick (A160604)(S065023)(284 Or App 673) DISMISSED September 25, 2017 International Longshore & Warehouse Union, The v. Port of Portland (A157602) (S065156)(285 Or App 222) ______________ * Amended by Order, October 19, 2017.
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.