1998 OK JUD ETH 11•JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 1998-11
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 1998-11
1998 OK JUD ETH 11Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel14 août 1998
Texte intégral
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 1998-11
1998 OK JUD ETH 11
Decided: 08/14/1998
Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel
Cite as: 1998 OK JUD ETH 11, __ P.2d __
JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
Judicial Ethics Opinion 98-11
August 14, 1998
¶0 QUESTION: May a candidate for State judicial office, who is a former Judge (resigned or retired) use campaign literature referring to him/herself as "Judge," for example: "Elect Judge J. Doe"?
¶1 WE ANSWER: NO.
¶2 Canon 5(A): "…(3) A candidate for judicial office: (d) should not:…(iii) knowingly misrepresent the identity, qualifications, present position or other fact concerning the candidate or an opponent…"
¶3 Canon 5(E): "Canon 5 generally applies to all incumbent Judges and judicial candidates…"
¶4 An incumbent Judge may advise the electorate of his or her position as the prohibition is against any misrepresentation of the candidates’ position. If a judicial candidate is not a Judge, campaign literature or vocal announcements referring to the candidate as "Judge John Doe" is a misrepresentation and would appear to be an attempt to deceive the electorate.
¶5 A Judicial candidate can refer to a past judicial position – e.g. "former Special Judge J. Doe," or "former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court J. Doe," if the statement is true. The judicial candidate may explain prior judicial service by date, type of litigation experience and precise judicial position. But the key words of the Canon are NO MISREPRESENTATION OF "QUALIFICATIONS" OR "PRESENT POSITION."
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.