2006 OK JUD ETH 2•JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2006-2
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2006-2
2006 OK JUD ETH 2Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel26 avr. 2006
Texte intégral
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2006-2
2006 OK JUD ETH 2
Decided: 04/26/2006
Cite as: 2006 OK JUD ETH 2, __ __
JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
JUDICAL ETHICS OPINION 2006-2
¶0 QUESTION: May a Judge of a District Court of the State of Oklahoma serve as a member of "The Dispute Resolutions Board" of a sovereign Indian Nation?
¶1 FACTS: The members of the Board would serve without pay. The duties of the board would be to settle disputes among tribal members or claims that tribal members, tribal council members or tribal administration have violated the Constitution, Bylaws or rules and regulations of the tribe.
¶2 ANSWER: No
¶3 DISCUSSION: The board as proposed will have the responsibility of deciding questions of fact as to matters coming before it. Canon 4C(2) provides "A judge should not accept appointment to a governmental committee or commission or other governmental position that is concerned with issues of fact or policy on matters other than the improvement of the law, the legal system or the administration of justice…" Canon 4F provides "A judge should not act as an arbitrator or mediator."
/s/Robert L. Bailey, Chairman
/s/Robert D. Simms, Vice Chairman
/s/Milton C. Craig, Secretary
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.