26-06SEC•IN THE MATTER OF KAREN JACKSON, GALLOWAY COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL, ATLANTIC COUNTY1/24/05, (#26-06 SEC)
IN THE MATTER OF KAREN JACKSON, GALLOWAY COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL, ATLANTIC COUNTY1/24/05, (#26-06 SEC)
26-06SECNjcommned
Texte intégral
#26-06 SEC (SEC Decision http://www.nj.gov/njded/legal/ethics/2005/c08-05.pdf) IN THE MATTER OF KAREN JACKSON, : COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION GALLOWAY COMMUNITY CHARTER : DECISION SCHOOL, ATLANTIC COUNTY. : : SYNOPSIS The School Ethics Commission (Commission) determined that Galloway Community Charter School Board of Trustees member Karen Jackson violated N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(i) of the Code of Ethics for School Board Members when she made a derogatory statement regarding a student- created project proposed by a teaching staff member, which was intended to provide instruction to fulfill the Core Curriculum Content Standards for Holocaust Education. After considering the nature of the charge, the Commission recommended that the Commissioner of Education impose a penalty of reprimand. Upon a thorough review of the record, the Commissioner, whose decision was restricted solely to a review of the Commission’s recommended penalty pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:12-29(c) and N.J.A.C. 6A:3-9.1, concurred with the Commission’s recommendation. The Commissioner thus ordered that Karen Jackson be reprimanded as a school official found to have violated the School Ethics Act. This synopsis is not part of the Commissioner’s decision. It has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Commissioner. January 24, 2006
AGENCY DKT NO. 382-12/05 IN THE MATTER OF KAREN JACKSON, : COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION GALLOWAY COMMUNITY CHARTER : DECISION SCHOOL, ATLANTIC COUNTY. : : The record of this matter and the decision of the School Ethics Commission (“Commission”), finding that Galloway Community Charter School Board of Trustees member Karen Jackson violated N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(i) of the Code of Ethics for School Board members when she made a derogatory statement regarding a student-created project proposed by a teaching staff member, which was intended to provide instruction to fulfill the Core Curriculum Content Standards for Holocaust Education. Upon issuance of the decision of the Commission, Ms. Jackson was provided 13 days from the mailing date of the decision to file written comments on the recommended penalty for the Commissioner’s consideration. No comments were filed by or on behalf of Ms. Jackson. Initially, it must be emphasized that, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:12-29(c) and N.J.A.C. 6A:3-9.1, the determination of the Commission as to violation of the School Ethics Act is not reviewable by the Commissioner herein. Only the Commission may determine whether a violation of the School Ethics Act occurred. The Commissioner’s jurisdiction is limited to reviewing the sanction to be imposed based upon a finding of a violation by the Commission. Therefore, this decision is restricted solely to a review of the Commission’s recommended penalty.
Upon a thorough review of the record, the Commissioner determines to accept the Commission’s recommendation that reprimand is the appropriate penalty in this matter for the reasons expressed in the Commission’s decision.1 In so ruling, the Commissioner is satisfied that in recommending a penalty for the violations it found, the Commission fully considered the nature of the offense and weighed the effects of aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Therefore, the Commission’s recommended penalty in this matter will not be disturbed. Accordingly, IT IS hereby ORDERED that Karen Jackson be reprimanded as a school official found to have violated the School Ethics Act. IT IS SO ORDERED.2 ACTING COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION Date of Decision: January 24, 2006 Date of Mailing: January 24, 2006 1 It is noted that Ms. Jackson resigned as a Board of Trustees member effective April 22, 2005. 2 This decision may be appealed to the State Board of Education pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:6-27 et seq. and N.J.A.C. 6A:4-1.1 et seq. 3
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.