Joseph S. Haas, Jr. v. Town of Gilmanton

CourtListener 10309398Nh13 mai 2021

Texte intégral

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2020-0325, Joseph S. Haas, Jr. v. Town of
Gilmanton, the court on May 13, 2021, issued the following
order:

Having considered the opening and reply briefs of the plaintiff, Joseph S.
Haas, Jr., the memorandum of law of the defendant, the Town of Gilmanton,
and the record submitted on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is
unnecessary in this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the appealing party,
the plaintiff, has not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); see also
Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014).

Affirmed.

Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.

Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.