ROBERT A PASIONEK V ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

169866Tribunal supérieur18 juin 2026

Texte intégral

Michigan Supreme Court
Lansing, Michigan
Megan K. Cavanagh,
Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra
Richard H. Bernstein
Elizabeth M. Welch
Kyra H. Bolden
Kimberly A. Thomas
Noah P. Hood,
Justices
I, Elizabeth Kingston-Miller, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
June 18, 2026
a0615
Order
Clerk
June 18, 2026
SC: 169866 & (3)(8)(13)(15)(19)
ADB: 25-2-GA
ROBERT A. PASIONEK,
Plaintiff,
v
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD,
Defendant.
On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration and to supplement
are GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is
DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The
requests for stay are DENIED.

-- 1 of 1 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.