IN RE KNOX

Court of Appeals, State of Michigan
ORDER
IN RE KNOX
Docket No. 377060
LC No. 2019-879106-DM
Christopher M. Murray
Presiding Judge
James Robert Redford
Kathleen A. Feeney
Judges
The motion to waive fees is GRANTED for this case only.
The motion for immediate consideration is DENIED.
The motion to file an amended complaint is GRANTED and the complaint filed with the
motion is accepted.
The motion to file a reply brief is GRANTED and the reply filed with the motion is
accepted.
The motion to file a supplemental affidavit is GRANTED.
The motion to file a consolidated supplemental brief is DENIED.
Although plaintiff titled her filing as a complaint for a writ of mandamus, it is properly
considered as a complaint for a writ of superintending control. See MCR 3.302(C) (“A superintending
control order replaces . . . the writ of mandamus when directed to a lower court[.]”); see also People v
Johnson, 345 Mich App 51, 59; 3 NW3d 846 (2022) (interpreting improperly labeled complaint for
mandamus as an action for superintending control). So considered, the complaint for
superintending control is DENIED.
_______________________________
Presiding Judge
A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr. , Chief Clerk, on
Date

-- 1 of 1 --