USA v. Avalos et al

ORDER - Avalos's motion for compassionate release is denied without prejudice to refiling when he can show he has met either statutory requirement as to defendant Jose Avalos. Ordered by Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)District Court Ned1 mars 2021

Texte intégral

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSE AVALOS,

Defendant.

8:13CR88

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on defendant Jose Avalos’s (“Avalos”) pro se motion
seeking a reduction in sentence due to COVID-19 (Filing No. 257). Title 18, section
3582(c)(1)(A)(i) authorizes federal prisoners to move the Court to “reduce [their] term of
imprisonment” for “extraordinary and compelling reasons.” But a prisoner can only file
such a motion after he “has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of
the Bureau of Prisons [(“BOP”)] to bring a motion on his behalf or the lapse of 30 days
from the receipt of such a request by the warden of his facility, whichever is earlier.” Id.;
see also United States v. Raia, 954 F.3d 594, 595 (3d Cir. 2020) (denying a defendant’s
motion under § 3582(c)(1)(A) because he did not give the BOP thirty days to respond to
his request for compassionate release).
Avalos’s motion specifically states he has not taken any steps to exhaust his
administrative remedies or otherwise comply with § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Avalos implies that
he is not required to comply with the statute because he is not in BOP custody and is being
held in the Grady County Correctional Center, in Chickasha, Oklahoma. Jurisdictional
issues notwithstanding, Avalos’s failure to show he has complied with § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)’s
statutory prerequisites to judicial review “presents a glaring roadblock foreclosing
compassionate release at this point.” Raia, 954 F.3d at 597 (finding strict statutory
compliance necessary, particularly given the “BOP’s statutory role, and its extensive and
professional efforts to curtail the virus’s spread”). Accordingly, Avalos’s motion for
8:13-cr-00088-RFR-SMB Doc # 259 Filed: 03/01/21 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>

2

compassionate release is denied without prejudice to refiling when he can show he has met
either statutory requirement.
Dated this 1st day of March 2021.

BY THE COURT:

Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.
United States District Judge

8:13-cr-00088-RFR-SMB Doc # 259 Filed: 03/01/21 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.