USA v. Ruiz-Lue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
vs.
(1) EDWIN ELENILSON RUIZ-LUE
§
§
§
§
§
NO: SA:25-CR-00651(1)-XR
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION
On this date came on to be considered the Memorandum and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge, filed in the above-styled and numbered cause. Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §636(b), this Court referred to the Magistrate Judge the administration of Defendant's
guilty plea and allocution under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. See United
States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997). Defendant consented to the administration of the
guilty plea and allocution by the Magistrate Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation and finds it to be neither
clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge filed in this cause be and is accepted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) such
that Defendant's guilty plea is ACCEPTED.
Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations
must serve and file his written objections within ten days after being served with a copy of them.
If objections are filed within fourteen (14) days, this order will be rescinded and the Court may
conduct a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de
novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and
Case 5:25-cr-00651-XR Document 24 Filed 01/06/26 Page 1 of 2

recommendations to which objection is made.").
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2026.
______________________________
XAVIER RODRIGUEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:25-cr-00651-XR Document 24 Filed 01/06/26 Page 2 of 2