Reyes Medrano v. Andrade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MCALLEN DIVISION
DAVID REYES MEDRANO,
Plaintiff,
VS.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Case No. 7:25-CV-00450
JOSE ANDRADE,
Defendant.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pending before the Court is the March 6, 2026, Memorandum
and Recommendation (“M&R”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Juan F. Alanis. (Dkt.
No. 6). Judge Alanis made findings and conclusions and recommended that
Plaintiff’s Complaint, (Dkt. No. 2), be dismissed, (Dkt. No. 6).
The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the M&R.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party filed an objection. As a result,
review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th
Cir. 2005). No plain error appears.
Accordingly, the Court accepts the M&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court.
It is therefore ordered that:
(1) Judge Alanis’s M&R, (Dkt. No. 6), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its
entirety as the holding of the Court; and
(2) Plaintiff’s Complaint, (Dkt. No. 2), is DISMISSED with prejudice as
frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
It is SO ORDERED.
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
April 24, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 7:25-cv-00450 Document 7 Filed 04/23/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2
Signed on April 23, 2026.
___________________________________
DREW B. TIPTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 7:25-cv-00450 Document 7 Filed 04/23/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2