6:25-cv-00049•Dickerson v. Victoria County City Police Officers, Victoria, Tx et al
Dickerson v. Victoria County City Police Officers, Victoria, Tx et al
6:25-cv-00049Txsd27 mars 2026
Texte intégral
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED March 27, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 6:25-cv-00049 Document 34 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Case 6:25-cv-00049 Document 34 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 6:25-cv-00049 Document 34 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page1of2 United States District Court Southem District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 27, 2026 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk VICTORIA DIVISION RUDY DICKERSON, § § Plaintiff, § § Vv. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:25-CV-00049 § VICTORIA COUNTY POLICE OFFICERS, § VICTORIA, TX, ef al, § § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 31). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff's claims, (D.E. 28), and impose a “strike” under 28 U.S.C, § 1915(g). (D.E. 31, p. 15). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C, § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *J (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.} (citation omitted), Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety, (D.E. 31). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's claims, (D.E. 28), and IMPOSES a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915¢g). The Court INSTRUCTS the Clerk of Court to send notice of this dismissal to 1/2 AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO Case 6:25-cv-00049 Document 34 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2 the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at Three Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov. The Court will enter a final judgment separately. ] DAVID'SSMORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SO ORDERED, Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas March 2942026 2/2 : |
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.