5:26-cv-00483•Safi v. Bondi,
Texte intégral
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION YAHYA SAFI § § § § § VS. PAMELA BONDI1 et al. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:26-cv-483 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court referred Petitioner’s Writ of Habeas Corpus and Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment to United States Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga for a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13). After holding a hearing, Judge Song Quiroga found that Petitioner met his burden under the Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) framework to demonstrate that his removal was not reasonably foreseeable, and that Respondents failed to rebut that showing (Dkt. No. 18 at 9–10). Judge Song Quiroga highlights that Respondents failed to show Petitioner had any “disciplinary infraction[s], mental health issues, [or] prior immigration violations” (Dkt. No. 18 at 4). Respondents also neglected to prove he posed a “flight risk, [or] danger to the community” or that he would fail “to cooperate, [which] would independently support continued detention” (Dkt. No. 18 at 4, 9). Further, Petitioner has no known criminal history (Dkt. No. 18 at 9). Considering all factors, Judge Song Quiroga recommends Petitioner’s release pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(3), (6) (Dkt. No. 18 at 10, 12). The fourteen-day objection period has lapsed, and no party objected to this recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court reviewed the Report 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Todd Blanche is automatically substituted for Respondent Pamela Bondi in this case. David Venturella is substituted for Respondent Todd Lyons under this same rule. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to substitute these parties on the docket sheet. United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED July 07, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 5:26-cv-00483 Document 19 Filed 07/07/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2 and Recommendation for clear error. CGI Logistics, LLC v. Fast Logistik, No. 5:23-CV- 43, 2023 WL 8313341, at *2 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 1, 2023) (Garcia Marmolejo, J.) (citing United States v. Soto, 734 F. App’x 258, 259 (5th Cir. 2018)); see also Cao v. BSI Fin. Servs., Inc., 858 F. App’x 156, 158 (5th Cir. 2021). Finding none, the Court hereby ADOPTS IN WHOLE Judge Song Quiroga’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 18). Accordingly, Petitioner’s Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED IN PART (Dkt. No. 1). Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED (Dkt. No. 10). Petitioner’s requests for expedited review and an Order to Show Cause are DENIED AS MOOT. His request for attorney’s fees is DENIED. His request concerning third-country removal is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Respondents are ORDERED to RELEASE Petitioner from custody to a public place no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 9, 2026. Petitioner’s release is subject to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(3) and 8 C.F.R. § 241.5. Respondents are ORDERED to NOTIFY Petitioner’s counsel of the exact location and exact time of his release as soon as practicable and no less than two hours before his release. The parties are ORDERED to file a Joint Status Report no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 13, 2026, confirming that Petitioner has been released. It is so ORDERED. SIGNED July 7, 2026. ___________________________________ Marina Garcia Marmolejo United States District Judge Case 5:26-cv-00483 Document 19 Filed 07/07/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.