4:25-cv-04209•Alexander v. Montgomery County Community Supervision & Corrections Department, et al
Alexander v. Montgomery County Community Supervision & Corrections Department, et al
4:25-cv-04209Txsd8 avr. 2026
Texte intégral
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MARGARET ALEXANDRA ALEXANDER § vs MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY SUPERVISION & CORRECTIONS, et al § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-25-4209 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Pending before the Court in the above referenced proceeding is Defendants Montgomery County Sheriffs Office, Montgomery County District Attorney' s Office, Montgomery County Community Supervision & Corrections Department, Montgomery County Attorney' s Office, Brett Ligon, and Laurie Frankenfield (Montgomery County Defendants) Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No 53) and Defendant the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services' (DFPS) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 54) together responses and replies, and Magistrate Judge Bennett's Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No . 101). Plaintiff has filed objections (Doc. No. 102) to the Memorandum and Recommendation. The Court has carefully reviewed, de novo, the filings, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge' s Memorandum and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, and agrees with the Magistrate Judge ' s conclusions. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff Objections (Doc. No. 102) are OVERRULED; the Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No. 101) is ADOPTED; and Defendants Montgomery County Sheriff's Office, Montgomery County District Attorney' s Office, Montgomery County Community Supervision & Corrections Department, Montgomery County Attorney' s Office, Brett Ligon, and United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED April 08, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 4:25-cv-04209 Document 103 Filed 04/08/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Laurie Frankenfield Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No 53) and Defendant the Texas Department of
Family and Protective Services' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 54) are GRANTED. Plaintiffs
Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE It is further
ORDERED that all other pending motions (Doc. Nos. 11 , 13, 14, 20, 24, 26, 41 , 79) are
DENIED AS MOOT . .
-('---
SIGNED on this __'o' __ day of April 2026.
ANDREW S. HANEN ......___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Case 4:25-cv-04209 Document 103 Filed 04/08/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.