Viann'K Mansur LLC v. EstiloIsabella LLC et al

4:23-cv-02914Txsd14 nov. 2025

Texte intégral

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
November 14, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 4:23-cv-02914 Document 74 Filed on 11/14/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Case 4:23-cv-02914 Document 74 Filed on 11/14/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 4:23-cv-02914 Document 74 Filed on 11/14/25 in TXSD Page1of2
United States District Court

Southem District of Texas

ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 14, 2025
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk

HOUSTON DIVISION

§
VIANN’K MANSUR, LLC, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§ Civil Action No.
Vv § 4:23-cv-2914
§
ESTILOISABELLA, LLC, §
and JACQUELINE G. ESPINOZA, §
§
Defendant. §
§

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending is Plaintiff Viann’K Mansur LLC’s Motion for
Sanctions (Document No. 59) and Defendant EstiloIsabella LLC and
Jacqueline G. Espinoza’s Motion for Reconsideration and Response
to Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions (Document No. 62). The Court
has received from the Magistrate Judge a Memorandum,
Recommendation, and Order recommending that Defendants’ Motion for
Reconsideration be denied and Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions be
granted in part. The deadline for objections has passed, and no
objection was filed.

After having made a de novo determination of the Motion for
Reconsideration, Motion for Sanctions, and response, the Court
finds that the opinion of the Magistrate Judge is correct and

should be and hereby is accepted in its entirety.

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Case 4:23-cv-02914 Document 74 _ Filed on 11/14/25 in TXSD -—— Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED for the reasons set
forth in the Memorandum, Recommendation, and Order of the United
States Magistrate Judge signed and filed on October 21, 2025
(Document No. 67), which is adopted in its entirety as the opinion
of this Court, that Defendant EstiloIsabella LLC and Jacqueline G.
Espinoza’s Motion for Reconsideration (Document No. 62) is DENIED
and Plaintiff Viann’K Mansur LLC’s Motion for Sanctions (Document
No. 59) is GRANTED IN PART.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk will enter this Order and send copies to all parties

of record.

Signed at Houston, Texas this [7 ig a November, 2025.

NY perlktiry

United Sfagves District Judge

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.