3:23-cv-00155•Dressen et al v Flaherty et al
Texte intégral
1/2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION BRIANNE DRESSEN, et al., Plaintiffs. VS. ROB FLAHERTY, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § 3:23-cv-00155 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION On May 13, 2025, all pretrial matters in this case were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Dkt. 98. Judge Edison filed a memorandum and recommendation on December 11, 2025, recommending that the court grant five motions to dismiss (Dkts. 85, 88, 89, 94, and 96) filed by the defendants. See Dkt. 113 at 25. On January 9, 2026, the plaintiffs filed objections to the memorandum and recommendation. Dkt. 115. One of the defendants, Andrew Slavitt, also filed objections. Dkt. 116. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge’s] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection [has been] made.” After conducting this de novo review, the court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED February 10, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 3:23-cv-00155 Document 126 Filed 02/10/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2/2 The court has carefully considered the objections, the memorandum and recommendation, the pleadings, and the record. The court accepts Judge Edison’s memorandum and recommendation and adopts it as the opinion of the court. It is therefore ordered that: (1) Judge Edison’s memorandum and recommendation (Dkt. 113) is approved and adopted in its entirety as the holding of the court; and (2) Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Dkts. 85, 88, 89, 94, and 96) are granted. SIGNED on Galveston Island this 10th day of February, 2026. ______________________________ JEFFREY VINCENT BROWN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:23-cv-00155 Document 126 Filed 02/10/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.