3:23-cv-00126•Insurance Distribution Consulting, LLC v. Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company
Insurance Distribution Consulting, LLC v. Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company
3:23-cv-00126Txsd14 mai 2026
Texte intégral
1/2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION INSURANCE DISTRIBUTION CONSULTING, LLC, Plaintiff. V. FIDELITY & GUARANTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § 3:23-cv-00126 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION On December 30, 2025, all pretrial matters in this case were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Dkt. 87. Judge Edison filed a memorandum and recommendation on March 2, 2026, recommending that the defendant’s motions for summary judgment (Dkts. 44, 79) be granted and its motion to exclude expert testimony (Dkt. 69) be denied as moot. Dkt. 102. On March 16, 2026, the plaintiff filed its objections to the memorandum and recommendation. Dkt. 103. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge’s] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection [has been] made.” After conducting this de novo review, the court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED May 14, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 3:23-cv-00126 Document 112 Filed 05/14/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2/2 The court has carefully considered the objections; the memorandum and recommendation; the pleadings; and the record. The court accepts Judge Edison’s memorandum and recommendation and adopts it as the opinion of the court. It is therefore ordered that: (1) Judge Edison’s memorandum and recommendation (Dkt. 102) is approved and adopted in its entirety as the holding of the court; and (2) The defendant’s motions for summary judgment (Dkts. 44, 79) are granted and its motion to exclude expert testimony (Dkt. 69) is denied as moot. SIGNED on Galveston Island this 14th day of May, 2026. ______________________________ JEFFREY VINCENT BROWN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:23-cv-00126 Document 112 Filed 05/14/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.