2:26-cv-00143•Ramos v. Corpus Christi Independent School District et al
Ramos v. Corpus Christi Independent School District et al
2:26-cv-00143Txsd22 juil. 2026
Texte intégral
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED July 22, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 2:26-cv-00143 Document 13 Filed 07/22/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Case 2:26-cv-00143 Document 13 Filed 07/22/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 2:26-cv-00143 Document13 _ Filed 07/22/26 in TXSD Page1of2 United States District Court Southem District of Texas ENTERED July 22, 2026 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ADRIAN RAMOS, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:26-CV-00143 § CORPUS CHRISTI INDEPENDENT § SCHOOL DISTRICT, ef al., § § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock’s Memorandum and Recommendation (““M&R”). (D.E. 10). The M&R recommends the Court dismiss Plaintiff's claims without prejudice and deny as moot Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (D.E. 2). (D.E. 10, p. 2). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States y. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell vy. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 10). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims without prejudice, (D.E. 1), and DENIES as moot Plaintiff's 1/2 AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO Case 2:26-cv-00143 Document 13 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (D.E. 2). SO ORDERED. Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas July 227, 2026 2/2 Filed 07/22/26 in TXSD__— Page 2 of 2 \, DAVID'S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.