Thompson v. James Thompson

1 / 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
SIDNEY MAURICE THOMPSON,
Plaintiff.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-000273
JACQUELYN JEAN JAMES
THOMPSON
§
Defendant. §
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
On December 11, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued
her “Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Failure to Prosecute” (D.E.
6). Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate
Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);
General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 6), and all other relevant
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
January 22, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:25-cv-00273 Document 11 Filed 01/22/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2 / 2
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
ORDERED on January 22, 2026.
_______________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-00273 Document 11 Filed 01/22/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2