Stout v. Bisignano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
MORGAN C.S., 	§
§
Plaintiff, 	§
§
V. 	§
§
FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of the 	§
Social Security Administration, 	§
§
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00231
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock's Order and Memorandum and
Recommendation ("M&R"). (D.E. 17). The M&R recommends that the Court affirm the decision
of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's final decision and dismiss this appeal
with prejudice. Id. at 1, 18.
The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate
Judge's M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); Fed. R. C1v. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No
objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only
determine whether the Magistrate Judge's M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United
States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan
Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon,
J.) (citation omitted).
Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings
of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous
or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 17). Accordingly, the Court
AFFIRMS the Commissioner's final decision and DISMISSES with prejudice this appeal.
1/2
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
June 15, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:25-cv-00231 Document 19 Filed 06/15/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

The Court will enter a final judgment separately.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: San Diego, California
June 15th, 2026
2/2
DAVI~-•-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-00231 Document 19 Filed 06/15/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2