Wood v. Warden FCI Three Rivers

2:25-cv-00096Txsd7 nov. 2025

Texte intégral

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
November 07, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:25-cv-00096 Document 14 Filed 11/07/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Case 2:25-cv-00096 Document 14 Filed 11/07/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 2:25-cv-00096
Document 14 Filed 11/07/25 in TXSD
Page 1 of 2 United States District Court Southern District of Texas
ENTERED November 07, 2025 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
CURTIS WOOD,
§ §
Petitioner,
V.
WARDEN FCI THREE RIVERS,
Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"). (D.E. 11). The M&R recommends that the Court grant Respondent's motion for summary judgment and dismiss Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Id. at 2.
The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge's M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted).
Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 11). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Respondent's motion for summary judgment, (D.E. 9), and DISMISSES without prejudice Petitioner's § 2241 petition. (D.E. 1).
1/2
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO
as las cas las las cas cas
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00096

Case 2:25-cv-00096
Document 14 Filed 11/07/25 in TXSD
Page 2 of 2
The Court will enter a final judgment separately. SO ORDERED.
DAVID S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas November 2, 2025
.
4.
2/ 2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.