Bautista-Medina v. Vergara, et al

1 / 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
VICTOR GENARO BAUTISTA-
MEDINA,
§
§
“Petitioner,” §
§
v. §
§
Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-00551
MIGUEL VERGARA, et al.,
in their official capacities,
“Respondents.”
§
§
§
ORDER
Before the Court is Petitioner’s “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Dkt. No. 1) (“Petition”) and
the “Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation” (Dkt. No. 4) (“R&R”). The R&R recommends that
the Court (1) deny the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) and (2) direct the Clerk of Court to close the case. Dkt. No. 4
at 1.
Objections to the R&R were due July 10, 2026. No objections were filed. If there have been no
objections to the magistrate’s ruling, the Court reviews the magistrate judge’s conclusions for clear error.
See Guillory v. PPG Indus., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005).
Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R (Dkt. No. 4) is
ADOPTED. The Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED and the Clerk of the Court is hereby ORDERED to
close this case.
SIGNED this July 20, 2026
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
July 20, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 1:26-cv-00551 Document 5 Filed 07/20/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 1