Salazar v. Lockheed Martin Corporation

4:25-cv-01364Txnd26 mars 2026

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
M ARC G ABRIEL SALAZAR ,
Plaintiff,
v. 	No. 4:25-cv-01364-P-BJ
L OCKHEED M ARTIN CORP.,
Defendant.
ORDER
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions,
and a Recommendation in this case regarding an Emergency Motion.
ECF Nos. 36–7. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the
proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error.
Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings
and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are
accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff’s
Motion is, therefore, DENIED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED on this 26th day of March 2026.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
REGINALEA KEMP ,
Plaintiff,
v. 	No. 4:23-cv-00841-P
REGIONS BANK ET AL .,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File
Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 18. Having considered the Motion
and applicable docket entries, the Court GRANTS the Motion.
SO ORDERED on this 18th day of September 2023.
______________________________________________
Mark T. Pittman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:25-cv-01364-P Document 53 Filed 03/26/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.