Riding Nigbur v. United States of America et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
LISA IRENE RIDING NIGBUR,
Plaintiff,
§
§
§
§
v. 	§
§ 	No. 3:25-CV-0725-D-BT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et. al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The 	United 	States 	Magistrate 	Judge 	made 	findings, 	conclusions, 	and 	a
recommendation in this case on February 2, 2026. Plaintiff filed on February 27, 2026 a
motion for leave to file objection to recommendation of vexatious-litigant designation, for
clarification of record, and for equitable relief (“Plaintiff’s Motion”).
The court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation de
novo. Finding no error, the court adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation
of the United States Magistrate Judge and— with one exception—denies Plaintiff’s Motion
with prejudice. It is not necessary for plaintiff to obtain court leave to file an objection to
the magistrate judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendation. 	So that part of
Plaintiff’s Motion is denied without prejudice as moot.
By separate judgment, this action is being dismissed with prejudice under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
The court prospectively certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken
in good faith. F ED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(3). In support of this certification, the court adopts
Case 3:25-cv-00725-D-BT Document 10 Filed 03/06/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>

and 	incorporates 	by 	reference 	the 	magistrate 	judge’s 	findings, 	conclusions, 	and
recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 and n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based
on the findings and recommendation, the court finds that any appeal of this action would
present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v.
King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (per curiam). In the event of an appeal, plaintiff
may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis
on appeal with the Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 	See
Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; F ED. R. A PP. P. 24(a)(5).
SO ORDERED.
March 6, 2026.
____________________________________
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER
SENIOR JUDGE
Case 3:25-cv-00725-D-BT Document 10 Filed 03/06/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>