Dallas MDL LLC v. State Farm Lloyds

3:24-cv-02994Txnd29 janv. 2026

Texte intégral

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
DALLAS MDL LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE FARM LLOYDS,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 3:24-CV-2994-X
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Before the Court are the parties’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. 23 and
25). Summary judgment is appropriate only where the pleadings and evidence show
“that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled
to judgment as a matter of law.”1 After reviewing the briefing and relevant law,
“genuine dispute” of “material fact” remain such that summary judgment is
inappropriate here.2
Namely, there remain factual disputes as to the cause of the damage to the
concrete slab and whether State Farm investigated Dallas MDL’s claim in good faith.
So the Court cannot grant summary judgment and these questions must be decided
by the trier of fact.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of January, 2026.
___________________________________
BRANTLEY STARR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 FED. R. CIV. P. 56(a).
2 Id.
Case 3:24-cv-02994-X Document 41 Filed 01/29/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.