Anderson v. Johnson et al

- 1 -
No. 6:24-cv-00040
Samuel Anderson,
Plaintiff,
v.
FNU Johnson et al.,
Defendants.
O R D E R
Plaintiff, a prisoner confined in the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice proceeding pro se, sued defendants for alleged
constitutional and civil rights violations. Doc. 1. The case was
transferred to the Tyler Division of the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas, Doc. 3, and assigned to a magistrate
judge. The magistrate judge issued a report recommending that
plaintiff’s claims be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a
claim and that any request for class certification be denied. Doc.
4 at 7. No party filed written objections.
When there have been no timely objections to a report, “the
court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face
of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes
to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the record and being satis-
fied that there is no clear error, the court accepts the report’s find-
ings and recommendations. All claims in this matter are dismissed
with prejudice. Any request for class certification is denied. Any
pending motions are denied as moot.
So ordered by the court on February 13, 2026.
J. CAM PB EL L BA RK ER
United States District Judge
Case 6:24-cv-00040-JCB-KNM Document 5 Filed 02/13/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>