4:25-cv-01295•Ojiambo v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Texte intégral
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION CATHERINE OJIAMBO v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION § § § § § § § CIVIL NO. 4:25-CV-01295-SDJ-BD MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 5, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #19), that Plaintiff Catherine Ojiambo’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #3), be denied. Plaintiff filed Objections, (Dkt. #21), to the Report. The Court conducted a de novo review of the Objections and the portions of the Report to which Plaintiff specifically objects, and the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and that the Objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #3), is DENIED. Case 4:25-cv-01295-SDJ-BD Document 48 Filed 12/21/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 Case 4:25-cv-01295-SDJ-BD Document 48 Filed 12/21/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 4:25-cv-01295-SDJ-BD Document 48 Filed 12/21/25 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #: <pagelD> IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION CATHERINE OJIAMBO § Vv. CIVIL NO. 4:25-CV-01295-SDJ-BD FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 5, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #19), that Plaintiff Catherine Ojiambo’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #8), be denied. Plaintiff filed Objections, (Dkt. #21), to the Report. The Court conducted a de novo review of the Objections and the portions of the Report to which Plaintiff specifically objects, and the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and that the Objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #8), is DENIED. Case 4:25-cv-01295-SDJ-BD Document 48 Filed 12/21/25 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #: <pagelD> So ORDERED and SIGNED this 21st day of December, 2025. SEAN 5. we UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.