DeBase v. Whaley et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
JASPEN DEBASE, #91294
v.
FNU WHALEY, ET AL.
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL NO. 4:25-CV-00829-BD
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Jaspen DeBase filed a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. 3. The
action was assigned to me, Dkt. 8, and the parties consented to my conducting all proceedings,
Dkts. 11, 28.
On January 20, 2026, the court entered a memorandum and order, Dkt. 27, granting the
officers’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. 16, and dismissing DeBase’s claims without prejudice. The court
gave DeBase 30 days from the receipt of the order to file, on a standard § 1983 form, an amended
complaint that includes detailed and particularized allegations with respect to the claims addressed
in that order. Dkt. 27 at 9. The court admonished DeBase that if he failed to timely file an amended
complaint on the standard § 1983 form, the court would dismiss with prejudice his claims against
the officers. Id. at 10. DeBase has not filed an amended complaint.
For the reasons stated in the memorandum and order, Dkt. 27, it is ORDERED that DeBase’s
claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Case 4:25-cv-00829-BD Document 29 Filed 02/27/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>