Jayroe v. Edgeworth, et al.

4:25-cv-00405Txed14 janv. 2026

Texte intégral

1
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
CHARLES J. JAYROE
v.
ROBERT JAMES MCEWAN
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL NO. 4:25-CV-00405-SDJ-BD
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in
this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 29, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered
proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #62), that
Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #59), be denied and that the
Amended Complaint, (Dkt. #31), be dismissed with prejudice.
Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no
timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and
conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s
Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction,
(Dkt. #59), is DENIED, and Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
Case 4:25-cv-00405-SDJ-BD Document 63 Filed 01/14/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>
2
Case 4:25-cv-00405-SDJ-BD Document 63 Filed 01/14/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 4:25-cv-00405-SDJ-BD Document63_ Filed 01/14/26 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #:
<pagelD>

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

CHARLES J. JAYROE §

§
v. § CIVIL NO. 4:25-CV-00405-SDJ-BD

§
ROBERT JAMES MCEWAN §

§

§

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in
this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 686. On December 29, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered
proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #62), that
Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #59), be denied and that the
Amended Complaint, (Dkt. #31), be dismissed with prejudice.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no
timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and
conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s
Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction,
(Dkt. #59), is DENIED, and Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE.

Case 4:25-cv-00405-SDJ-BD Document63_ Filed 01/14/26 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #:
<pagelD>

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 14th day of January, 2026.

SEAN <.. we
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.