Bailey v. Tractor Supply Company et al

2:25-cv-01090Txed12 mars 2026

Texte intégral

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
DANNY BAILEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY and
TRACTOR SUPPLY CO. OF TEXAS,
LP,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 2:25-CV-01090-JRG-RSP
ORDER
Plaintiff Danny Bailey (“Plaintiff”) previously filed a Motion to Remand to State Court
(“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 5.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No.
25), recommending grant of Plaintiff’s Motion. Defendants Tractor Supply Company and Tractor
Supply Company of Texas, LP (“Defendants”) have now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 26), with
Plaintiff filing a Response (Dkt. No. 29.)
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Plaintiff’s Motion, the Report and
Recommendation, and the briefing on Defendants’ Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning
provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show
that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES
Defendants’ Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the
Motion (Dkt. No. 5) is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the above-captioned case is
REMANDED to the 71st Judicial District of Harrison County, Texas, instanter.
.
____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 12th day of March, 2026.
Case 2:25-cv-01090-JRG-RSP Document 31 Filed 03/12/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.