1:25-cv-00212•Strother v. Strause
Texte intégral
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION REGINALD STROTHER § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:25-CV-212 ROBERT STRAUSE § ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Reginald Strother, a federal prisoner, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Lieutenant Robert Strause. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action pursuant to sanctions previously imposed in civil action number 1:16-CV-7. No objections were filed, and a final judgment was entered. After the judgment was entered, Plaintiff filed objections and a Motion to Reinstate the action for consideration of those objections. Plaintiff demonstrated that he did not receive a copy of the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation in a timely manner, and that he gave his objections to prison officials for mailing within fourteen days of receipt of the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Motion to Reinstate should be granted to the extent that Plaintiff will receive de novo review. The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and the pleadings. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. Case 1:25-cv-00212-MJT-CLS Document 12 Filed 03/16/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
72(b). After careful consideration of all the pleadings and the relevant case law, the Court concludes the objections are without merit. This action will be dismissed in accordance with the sanctions imposed in civil action number 1:16-CV-7. ORDER Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate [Dkt. 7] is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff’s objections have received de novo review. Plaintiff’s objections [Dkt. 6] are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and the conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge [Dkt. 3] is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with this Order. 2 ____________________________ Michael J. Truncale United States District Judge SIGNED this 16th day of March, 2026. Case 1:25-cv-00212-MJT-CLS Document 12 Filed 03/16/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.