Sanders v. Prince et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALPHONSO SANDERS,
Plaintiff
V.
DR. PRINCE, et al.,--
Defendants
No. 3:25cv234
(Judge Munley)
............................................................................................................• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ •••••••••••••• ■ ••••••••••••••••••••• ■ ■ • ■ •• ■ •• ■ • • •••••••• ■ • ■ ••••••••••••••••• ■ ••••• ■ ■• ■ •••••
ORDER
AND NOW, to wit, this ~~January 2026, upon consideration of
the Rule 12(b) motion (Doc. 27) to dismiss by defendants Scott Prince and Mark
Abel , and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is
hereby ORDERED that:
1. 	The unopposed motion (Doc. 27) to dismiss is GRANTED.
2. 	The claims against Scott Prince and Mark Abel are DISMISSED
without prejudice to plaintiff's right to pursue appropriate relief
through the bankruptcy court.
3. 	The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
Case 3:25-cv-00234-JKM-CA Document 37 Filed 01/02/26 Page 1 of 2

4. 	Any appeal from this order is DEEMED frivolous and not taken in
good faith. 	See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
BY THE COURT:
2
Case 3:25-cv-00234-JKM-CA Document 37 Filed 01/02/26 Page 2 of 2