Keo v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LA’KEYA KEO,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil No. 1:25-CV-00126
Judge Jennifer P. Wilson
ORDER
Before the court is the report and recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab recommending that this action be dismissed
without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and that the case be closed.
(Doc. 17.) No party has filed objections to the report and recommendation,
resulting in the forfeiture of de novo review by this court. Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d
187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878–79 (3d
Cir. 1987)).
Following an independent review of the report and record, and affording
“reasoned consideration” to the uncontested portions of the report, EEOC v. City of
Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Henderson, 812 F.2d at
879), to “satisfy [the court] that there is no clear error on the face of the record,”
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, the court finds that Judge
Case 1:25-cv-00126-JPW Document 18 Filed 01/21/26 Page 1 of 2

2
Schwab’s analysis is well-reasoned and fully supported by the record and
applicable law. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1) The report and recommendation, Doc. 17, is ADOPTED.
2) This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because the
court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
s/Jennifer P. Wilson
JENNIFER P. WILSON
United States District Judge
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Dated: January 21, 2026
Case 1:25-cv-00126-JPW Document 18 Filed 01/21/26 Page 2 of 2