Coleman v. Carter

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
RASHAUD L. COLEMAN, 	)
)
Petitioner, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Case No. CIV-25-1326-SLP
)
T. CARTER, Warden, 	)
)
Respondent. 	)
O R D E R
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States
Magistrate Judge Chris M. Stephens [Doc. No. 7]. The R&R recommends that the Court
dismiss as moot the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc.
No. 1] because Petitioner has been transferred to another facility and, therefore, the Court
“lacks jurisdiction over Petitioner’s current custodian and can provide no relief to
Petitioner.” See [Doc. No. 7] at 1, 4.
The Magistrate Judge advised Petitioner of his right to object to the R&R and that
any failure to object would waive Petitioner’s right to appellate review of the factual and
legal issues addressed in the R&R. Id. at 5. Petitioner has neither filed an objection nor
sought an extension of time in which to do so. Therefore, the Court finds that Petitioner
has waived further review of all issues addressed in the R&R. See Casanova v. Ulibarri,
595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010). 	Upon review, the Court fully concurs with the
analysis set forth in the R&R.
Case 5:25-cv-01326-SLP Document 10 Filed 01/27/26 Page 1 of 2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report & Recommendation [Doc. No. 7]
is ADOPTED in its entirety, and this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as
moot. A Judgment of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously herewith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27 th day of January, 2026.
Case 5:25-cv-01326-SLP Document 10 Filed 01/27/26 Page 2 of 2