Gilliss et al v. Airstream, Inc. et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
SAMUEL GILLISS and STEPHANIE GILLISS
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 3:25CV324
JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
V.
AIRSTREAM OF COLORADO LLC
ANDAIRSTREAMJNC.
Defendants.
ORDEROF DISMISSAL;TERMINATIONENTRY
The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has
been settled, IT IS ORDEREDthat this action is hereby DISMISSED,with prejudice as to the
parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen
the action if settlement is not consummated.
Parties intendingto preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should
be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U. S. 375 (1994), and
incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.
The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the
parties, if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: ^. -^-^.^ U<3sSV» II SJ^^.
WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case: 3:25-cv-00324-WHR-CHG Doc #: 31 Filed: 02/12/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>