3:25-cv-00200•Jordan v. Montgomery County Child Support Enforcement Agency
Jordan v. Montgomery County Child Support Enforcement Agency
3:25-cv-00200Ohsd24 févr. 2026
Texte intégral
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON LAMAR D. JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 3:25-cv-200 Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry ______________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE ______________________________________________________________________________ This action is before the Court upon Plaintiff Lamar D. Jordan’s (“Jordan”) failure to comply with the Court’s Order to Show Cause Regarding Service of Process (“Show Cause Order”) (Doc. No. 25). In issuing the Show Cause Order, the Court required Jordan to show cause on or before Friday, February 20, 2025, why he has failed to serve Defendant Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (“ODJFS”) within the time prescribed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 25 at PageID 132.) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), “[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court … must dismiss the action or order that service be made within a specified time.” “The [90]-day time limit may be extended by the court only if the plaintiff demonstrates good cause for failure to timely serve the defendant.” Leisure v. Ohio, 12 F. App’x. 320, 321 (6th Cir. 2001) (citations omitted). Jordan has failed to even make an attempt at serving ODJFS here and he has neither demonstrated good cause for that failure, nor has he established good cause to extend the time in which he may properly serve ODJFS. Therefore, in accordance Case: 3:25-cv-00200-TMR-CHG Doc #: 27 Filed: 02/24/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 with Rule 4(m), the Court hereby DISMISSES Jordan’s claims against ODJFS WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This ruling finally disposes of Jordan’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 10) and the Clerk is directed to TERMINATE this action on the Court’s docket. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Tuesday, February 24, 2026. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 3:25-cv-00200-TMR-CHG Doc #: 27 Filed: 02/24/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.